<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Organic Search SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/tag/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canonical URL &#8211; A possible solution to duplicate content</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonical url]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duplicate Content Issues The 3 major search engines, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft, have just announced a new tag that can tell the search engines which URL it should have for the current page. The issue websites have is duplicate content, &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Duplicate Content Issues</h1>
<p>The 3 major search engines, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com');" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html">Google</a>, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/ysearchblog.com');" href="http://ysearchblog.com/2009/02/12/fighting-duplication-adding-more-arrows-to-your-quiver/">Yahoo</a> and <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.msdn.com');" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/webmaster/archive/2009/02/12/partnering-to-help-solve-duplicate-content-issues.aspx">Microsoft</a>, have just announced a new tag that  can tell the search engines which URL it should have for the current page.</p>
<p>The issue websites have is duplicate content, the same content  is indexed under different URL&#8217;s.  This is an issue SEO&#8217;s have been trying to solve for a long time.</p>
<h2>New canonical URL tag</h2>
<p>To help solve this problem, the 3 major engines have declared that it will recognise a new HTML tag, which, if inserted into your web page, will allow you to specify which URL you want to be the &#8220;official&#8221;, URL for the content.</p>
<p>The tag needs to be inserted into the <code>HEAD</code> section of your web page:</p>
<p>HTML:  <code>&lt;link rel="canonical" href="http://www.yourwebsite.co.uk/correct-page.html"&gt;</code></p>
<p>XHTML: <code>&lt;link rel="canonical" href="http://www.yourwebsite.co.uk/correct-page.html" /&gt;</code></p>
<p>This code needs to be placed in the <code>HEAD</code> section not in the <code>BODY</code> section.</p>
<p>Google will now count the links it has seen to that campaign tagged URL, towards the canonical URL, and not index the campaign tagged URL.</p>
<p>In summary, may be to early to tell if this will help webmasters as it was only announced on the 12th February 2009, but in my opinion this is handing back a little bit of control to the webmaster instead of letting the search engine&#8217;s figure out the correct URL.</p>
<p>Disclaimer:  The tag is aonly a suggestion to the search engine. It will probably be used 99% of the time, but they have the right to handle things their way.</p>
<p><a href="http://yoast.com/wordpress/canonical/">Canonical URL plugin</a> for WordPress users now available from Joost de Valk.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Canonical+URL+%E2%80%93+A+possible+solution+to+duplicate+content+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D79" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank Penalty given to Google</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-pagerank-penalty-given-to-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-pagerank-penalty-given-to-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has come to light over the past week or so that Google.co.jp has been caught paying bloggers to write about them to help improve their hold in the Japanese market as Yahoo are strong in Japan. Now, as we &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-pagerank-penalty-given-to-google/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has come to light over the past week or so that Google.co.jp has been caught paying bloggers to write about them to help improve their hold in the Japanese market as Yahoo are strong in Japan.</p>
<p>Now, as we know Google does not like link buying and has penalized sites for doing this with search ranking penalties.</p>
<p>To my amazement and to be honest this made me giggle, they have given themselves a PageRank penalty for link buying!</p>
<p>The site was previously a PR9 and now is a PR5, I don&#8217;t think it will have any real effect but certainly won&#8217;t do them any harm.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+PageRank+Penalty+given+to+Google+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D71" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-pagerank-penalty-given-to-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

