<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Organic Search SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google to Encrypt Search Data &#8211; Killing off Organic Data</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-encrypt-killing-organic-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-encrypt-killing-organic-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Encrypt search referrer data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it begins, Google to kill off organic data to webmasters for logged in users, I won&#8217;t re-hash and rant as there are plenty of useful posts out there. I will provide a quick summary though, the data is still there &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-encrypt-killing-organic-data/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it begins, Google to kill off organic data to webmasters for logged in users, I won&#8217;t re-hash and rant as there are plenty of useful posts out there.</p>
<p>I will provide a quick summary though, the data is still there but Google only offering aggregated data through Webmaster Tools but as mentioned by Barry Schwartz on Search Engine Roundtable, it&#8217;s not that <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-tools-accuracy-12768.html">accurate</a>. So begs the question is the data now being sent to webmasters useful?</p>
<p>So for more information on this topic here are a few useful posts:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Google Whores Out Users With False Privacy Claims" href="http://www.seobook.com/false-privacy-claims">Google Whores Out Users With False Privacy Claims</a> &#8211; Joost de Valk on SEO Book</li>
<li><a title="SEO Under Attack – The Google Analytics Keyword Data Apocalypse" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-under-attack-the-google-analytics-keyword-data-apocalypse/35090/">SEO Under Attack – The Google Analytics Keyword Data Apocalypse</a> &#8211; Alan Bleiweiss on Search Engine Journal</li>
<li><a title="Google To Begin Encrypting Searches &amp; Outbound Clicks By Default With SSL Search" href="http://searchengineland.com/google-to-begin-encrypting-searches-outbound-clicks-by-default-97435">Google To Begin Encrypting Searches &amp; Outbound Clicks By Default With SSL Search</a> &#8211; Danny Sullivan on Search Engine Land</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/19/google-rolls-out-https-search-for-logged-in-users/">Google Rolls Out Https Search For Logged In Users</a> (ghacks.net)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/27535/Google-to-Limit-Keyword-Search-Referral-Data-to-Marketers.aspx">Google to Limit Keyword Search Referral Data to Marketers</a> (hubspot.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+to+Encrypt+Search+Data+%E2%80%93+Killing+off+Organic+Data+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D285" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-encrypt-killing-organic-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO for SME&#8217;s What You Need To Know</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/seo-for-smes-what-you-need-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/seo-for-smes-what-you-need-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a business owner with a website, one of the most important things to consider is visibility. SEO also known as search engine optimisation, is a daunting project if not approached correctly. There are many ways to tackle SEO such &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/seo-for-smes-what-you-need-to-know/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a business owner with a website, one of the most important things to consider is visibility. SEO also known as search engine optimisation, is a daunting project if not approached correctly.</p>
<p>There are many ways to tackle SEO such as content creation, link building, keyword research and many more.</p>
<p>The danger of doing SEO without any prior knowledge can be detrimental to your website as many tactics that can be used may end up getting your site penalised.</p>
<p><strong>Building Blocks</strong></p>
<p>When beginning any search marketing campaign there are processes to address, firstly keyword research.</p>
<p>Without in depth keyword research a campaign can fall at the first step as identifying the correct keywords/phrases is vital to any success.</p>
<p>Once a defined list has been agreed the next phase is to then look at the website from an on-page and technical perspective.</p>
<p>This can identify any structural issues with the website as well identifying areas to improve.</p>
<p>Content is also a vital part of on page work to undertake, make sure your content is unique, not to keyword heavy, a reasonable amount of keywords to mention is perhaps 1-2 per 200 words, make the content useful for the user as conversion is the main goal for any website.</p>
<p><strong>Patience</strong></p>
<p>Once the website has then been &#8216;optimised&#8217; for the SERPs (search engine results pages), patience is the next important part of SEO as it&#8217;s not a quick fix.</p>
<p>It can take the search engine&#8217;s time to re-crawl your updated site so a handy tip is submitting an updated sitemap.xml file to the Google Webmaster Tools console (account setup and verification needed). This can help inform Google of changes and new pages to crawl.</p>
<p>Now a little bit of time has passed and your newly optimise site is appearing for your researched terms in the SERP&#8217;s what next?</p>
<p><strong>Links</strong></p>
<p>Link building is an important part of SEO as links to your site count as a &#8216;vote&#8217; but be careful when trying to attract links to your site as there are key factors involved to ensure a link to your site will be beneficial.</p>
<p>Relevancy is key, if your site is about and a site about laptops links to yours there is no relevancy between the 2 and therefore could be viewed as spamming which if this technique is adopted can lead to poor results.</p>
<p><strong>Quality Over Quantity</strong></p>
<p>Ensuring that the quality of a link is relevant to your site topic can lead to greater results 1 link from a highly related website will have more benefits than having 10&#8242;s to hundreds of unrelated links which could lead to a penalty.</p>
<p><strong>End Results</strong></p>
<p>SEO is a steady progression and making the wrong choices on a small budget can cost SME&#8217;s a lot more in terms of money if the wring strategy is adopted.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong></p>
<p>As SEO Account Director at MEC Manchester <del>SEO Operations manager for Latitude Digital Marketing</del>&#8216;s I have seen businesses that use &#8216;black hat seo&#8217; techniques as well as poorly planned strategies come a cropper compared to a professional and well planned campaign that reaps rewards.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=SEO+for+SME%E2%80%99s+What+You+Need+To+Know+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D221" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/seo-for-smes-what-you-need-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Google Algo Update</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/new-google-algo-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/new-google-algo-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/new-google-algo-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick post, it has been announced that a Google algorithm update is to happen in the US only for now but the recent Chrome block sites extension has helped identify 84% of blocked sites match in the algo. What does &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/new-google-algo-update/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick post, it has been announced that a Google algorithm update is to happen in the US only for now but the recent Chrome block sites extension has helped identify 84% of blocked sites match in the algo. </p>
<p>What does this mean?</p>
<p>Potentially for UK SERPS in the future sites that may be marked as link selling or spam sites may have their external links discounted further and pass no weight. </p>
<p>No indication of the release in UK yet but keep an eye on your site or clients rankings as if the drop a cleanse if backlinks will be required. </p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=New+Google+Algo+Update+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D230" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/new-google-algo-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why SME&#8217;s Should Employ Agencies for SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/why-smes-should-employ-agencies-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/why-smes-should-employ-agencies-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Operations Manager for the SME division of one of the UK&#8217;s leading digital marketing agencies i thought i would share my thoughts of why outsourcing SEO as a small business is key. You can find my blog post &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/why-smes-should-employ-agencies-for-seo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Operations Manager for the SME division of one of the UK&#8217;s leading digital marketing agencies i thought i would share my thoughts of why outsourcing SEO as a small business is key.</p>
<p>You can find my blog post on <a href="http://www.latitudegroup.com/blog/why-should-smes-consider-outsourcing-digital-marketing/">small business seo</a> over at the Latitude blog.</p>
<p>Key points I covered off include:</p>
<p>1 Price<br />
2 Resource<br />
3 Contracts<br />
4 Specialist Teams<br />
5 Accreditations<br />
6 Tools</p>
<p>Hope you fond my info if use.</p>
<p>Ciao for now.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Why+SME%E2%80%99s+Should+Employ+Agencies+for+SEO+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D193" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/why-smes-should-employ-agencies-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google site: only displays 3 significant digits</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-site-only-displays-3-significant-digits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-site-only-displays-3-significant-digits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site:]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest webmaster video from Matt Cutts explains that the site:domain search only shows 3 significant digits or pages indexed, for example if your site: query returns over a thousand pages then only the 1st 3 are indicative of the actual &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-site-only-displays-3-significant-digits/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest webmaster video from Matt Cutts explains that the site:domain search only shows 3 significant digits or pages indexed, for example if your site: query returns over a thousand pages then only the 1st 3 are indicative of the actual number.</p>
<p>Watch the video:</p>
<p><object width="640" height="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ix3mHeL7hg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;hd=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ix3mHeL7hg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="320"></embed></object></p>
<p>Ciao for now</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+site%3A+only+displays+3+significant+digits+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D141" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-site-only-displays-3-significant-digits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google May Day Update Affects Long Tail Search Queries</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-may-day-update-affect-long-tail-search-queries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-may-day-update-affect-long-tail-search-queries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long tail searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May Day Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new algorithmic change has been implemented by Google, affectionately know as the May Day update as it happened around 1st May 2010. Matt Cutts explains that the change is not temporary and the update is looking to improve the quality of the SERP&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-may-day-update-affect-long-tail-search-queries/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new algorithmic change has been implemented by Google, affectionately know as the May Day update as it happened around 1st May 2010. Matt Cutts explains that the change is not temporary and the update is looking to improve the quality of the SERP&#8217;s that is effecting long tail terms opposed to the head of searches.</p>
<p>Cutts explains that this update is independent to Google Caffeine which is preceding at pace. The update is assessing which sites are the best match for long tail queries. No human involvement in this update and it is purely algorithmic.</p>
<p>Is your SEO affected?</p>
<p>Think about your site, do you have a high quality site, good content and make sure that your site can be viewed as an authority for the search query so not matching off topic queries.</p>
<p>Watch the full video below:</p>
<p><object style="width: 580px; height: 360px;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="580" height="360" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WJ6CtBmaIQM&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1" /><embed style="width: 580px; height: 360px;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="580" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WJ6CtBmaIQM&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1"></embed></object></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+May+Day+Update+Affects+Long+Tail+Search+Queries+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D121" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-may-day-update-affect-long-tail-search-queries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Product Search &#8211; Testing Links again?</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-product-search-testing-links-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-product-search-testing-links-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone noticed that the product results in Google have been showing images and not directly linkg through to the site? A post from the Head of SEO  at Latitude, Andy Heaps posted back in December about how Latitude joke &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-product-search-testing-links-again/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed that the product results in Google have been showing images and not directly linkg through to the site?</p>
<p>A post from the Head of SEO  at Latitude, <a href="http://twitter.com/andyheaps">Andy Heaps</a> posted back in December about how Latitude joke about <a href="http://www.latitudegroup.com/weblog/permalink/googles_money_making_levers_pulled_again/">Google’s money making levers</a> – &#8220;if profits are down or shareholders unhappy they pick a money generating lever and pull it&#8221; highlighted this, and now seems that the same is going on again.</p>
<p>Only today have Google displayed both links and none in their product listings here is the latest of my searches:</p>
<div id="attachment_101" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 639px"><img class="size-full wp-image-101" title="google-prods-no-links" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/google-prods-no-links.jpg" alt="Google Products - No links" width="629" height="104" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Products - No links</p></div>
<p>So does this mean that Google are &#8220;pulling the levers&#8221; again or trying to improve the users exprerience?</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+Product+Search+%E2%80%93+Testing+Links+again%3F+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D100" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/google-product-search-testing-links-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canonical URL &#8211; A possible solution to duplicate content</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonical url]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duplicate Content Issues The 3 major search engines, Google, Yahoo and Microsoft, have just announced a new tag that can tell the search engines which URL it should have for the current page. The issue websites have is duplicate content, &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Duplicate Content Issues</h1>
<p>The 3 major search engines, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com');" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html">Google</a>, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/ysearchblog.com');" href="http://ysearchblog.com/2009/02/12/fighting-duplication-adding-more-arrows-to-your-quiver/">Yahoo</a> and <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.msdn.com');" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/webmaster/archive/2009/02/12/partnering-to-help-solve-duplicate-content-issues.aspx">Microsoft</a>, have just announced a new tag that  can tell the search engines which URL it should have for the current page.</p>
<p>The issue websites have is duplicate content, the same content  is indexed under different URL&#8217;s.  This is an issue SEO&#8217;s have been trying to solve for a long time.</p>
<h2>New canonical URL tag</h2>
<p>To help solve this problem, the 3 major engines have declared that it will recognise a new HTML tag, which, if inserted into your web page, will allow you to specify which URL you want to be the &#8220;official&#8221;, URL for the content.</p>
<p>The tag needs to be inserted into the <code>HEAD</code> section of your web page:</p>
<p>HTML:  <code>&lt;link rel="canonical" href="http://www.yourwebsite.co.uk/correct-page.html"&gt;</code></p>
<p>XHTML: <code>&lt;link rel="canonical" href="http://www.yourwebsite.co.uk/correct-page.html" /&gt;</code></p>
<p>This code needs to be placed in the <code>HEAD</code> section not in the <code>BODY</code> section.</p>
<p>Google will now count the links it has seen to that campaign tagged URL, towards the canonical URL, and not index the campaign tagged URL.</p>
<p>In summary, may be to early to tell if this will help webmasters as it was only announced on the 12th February 2009, but in my opinion this is handing back a little bit of control to the webmaster instead of letting the search engine&#8217;s figure out the correct URL.</p>
<p>Disclaimer:  The tag is aonly a suggestion to the search engine. It will probably be used 99% of the time, but they have the right to handle things their way.</p>
<p><a href="http://yoast.com/wordpress/canonical/">Canonical URL plugin</a> for WordPress users now available from Joost de Valk.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Canonical+URL+%E2%80%93+A+possible+solution+to+duplicate+content+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D79" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/canonical-url-a-possible-solution-to-duplicate-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to track your SEO rankings with Google Analytics</title>
		<link>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/how-to-track-your-seo-rankings-with-google-analytics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/how-to-track-your-seo-rankings-with-google-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favourite SEO and WordPress blogs is by Joost de Valk, and on the 5th january &#8217;09 a brilliant guest post by Andre Scholten explains how a Google Analytics filter can enable you to track your Google rankings. &#8230; <a href="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/how-to-track-your-seo-rankings-with-google-analytics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favourite SEO and WordPress blogs is by <a title="Joost de Valk" href="http://yoast.com/about-me/">Joost de Valk</a>, and on the 5th january &#8217;09 a brilliant guest post by <a title="Andre Scholten" href="http://andrescholten.nl/">Andre Scholten</a> explains how a Google Analytics filter can enable you to track your Google rankings.</p>
<p>So here is the post:</p>
<blockquote>
<h2>Track SEO rankings?</h2>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Well, you can&#8217;t specifically track the exact position of the keyword that was clicked like you can do with AdWords. But it is possible to determine the page he was on. A ranking tool can tell you over and over again that a certain keyword is around position 15 in Google while Google Analytics claims he is on page 1 (position 1 to 10). This effect can come from &#8216;personalized search&#8217; or &#8216;local results&#8217; that can influence the Google rankings dramatically. People see other results than you see with your ranking tools. And therefore you need Google Analytics to do the real ranking.</p>
<h2>Setup the filter</h2>
<p>To get the rankings in your Google Analytics reports you have to create a new filter:</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1320" title="Track SEO rankings with Google Analytics Photo" src="http://yoast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/analytics-google-ranking.png" alt="analytics google ranking" width="372" height="318" /></div>
<p>The title of the filter contains a 3, that&#8217;s because filter 1 and 2 take care of filtering out everything else than Google Organic traffic. So yes: you also have to create a new profile to apply these filters on to be sure you don&#8217;t screw up your main profile.</p>
<p>This filter only works for Google. if you want it to work for Yahoo and Live Search also, make sure you change the filters 1 and 2 so they accept Organic from all three of them. Then setup the filter like this:</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1321" title="Track SEO rankings with Google Analytics Photo" src="http://yoast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/analytics-ranking.png" alt="analytics ranking" width="368" height="319" /></div>
<h2>The ranking results</h2>
<p>After a while the &#8220;User Defined&#8221; report will look like this (ignore the language):</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1322" title="Track SEO rankings with Google Analytics Photo" src="http://yoast.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/rankings-example.png" alt="rankings example" /></div>
<p>What you see are not the actual rankings, but the number of the first result of the page the keyword was on. So when you see 20, it means the keyword was on the third page, and a 50 means the sixth page. (Yahoo and Live Search will report 21 and 51 in stead of 20 and 50).</p>
<p>When you don&#8217;t see a number but only &#8220;(page: ): it means the keyword was on the first page. So perhaps it is better to change &#8220;page:&#8221; to &#8220;minimal position;&#8221;, I leave that up to you.</p>
<p>If you want to filter the list of keywords on keywords with at least a page 2 position you can use &#8220;\(page: \d{2,3}\)&#8221; in the filter field below the list. The \d stands for digits, and the 2,3 for the amount of digits you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p></blockquote>
<p>The credit for the post is found on <a href="http://yoast.com/track-seo-rankings-google-analytics/">Joost&#8217;s blog</a>.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=How+to+track+your+SEO+rankings+with+Google+Analytics+http%3A%2F%2Forganic-search-seo.co.uk%2F%3Fp%3D40" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organic-search-seo.co.uk/how-to-track-your-seo-rankings-with-google-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

